ManuScript Details
|
Paper Id:
|
IJCIRAS1003
|
|
Title:
|
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SECTIONS USED IN INDUSTRIAL ROOF TRUSS AND PORTAL FRAME
|
| Published in: |
International Journal Of Creative and Innovative Research In All Studies |
| Publisher: |
IJCIRAS |
| ISSN: |
2581-5334 |
| Volume / Issue: |
Volume 1 Issue 1 |
| Pages: |
5
|
| Published On: |
12/5/2017 6:47:37 AM (MM/dd/yyyy) |
| PDF Url: |
http://www.ijciras.com/PublishedPaper/IJCIRAS1003.pdf |
Main Author Details
|
Name:
|
Nishchay Patel |
| Institute: |
Faculty of Technology, CEPT University |
Co - Author Details
| Author Name |
Author Institute |
| Dr. Dhara Shah |
Faculty of Technology, CEPT University |
Abstract
|
Research Area:
|
Structural engineering |
| KeyWord: |
Truss System, Portal Frame, Hollow Steel Sections, STAAD PRO V8i, IS800-2007 |
| Abstract: |
There are two types of roofing systems for any industrial building, truss system or portal frame. There is a vast difference in design of both systems and in materials. This study is to find the best possible option for constructing an industrial roof system efficiently. Even in both systems, there are options for building them with different materials. Truss systems are build using angle sections, square and rectangle hollow sections. Portal frames are build using built up box sections and I-beams. This study is also about to decide the sufficient economic material for truss and portal frame. I think due to the profile of the hollow sections, dead weight is likely to reduce for many structural members, which derives overall economy. And for any industrial roofing system, most critical part is the cost of materials. For proper effectiveness, four spans considered, 10 m, 15 m, 20 m & 25 m. All the trusses and portals designed for these four spans, and then material consumptions calculated. For designing, IS800:2007, IS875:1987 & Staad software used. Software calculations compared with manual calculations for justification. After this study, we can conclude the best efficient system about total material consumptions. For materials of portal frames, built up box sections are 116% heavier than ISMB sections. In truss system, using square hollow sections, we can get a saving of 77% rather than angle sections. Portal frames are 148% heavy to truss systems. The best option for roofing system is to build truss system with square hollow sections as material for 10 m to 25 m spans.
|
Citations
Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the links to import into a bibliography manager and reference.
|
IEEE
|
Nishchay Patel, Dr. Dhara Shah, "COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SECTIONS USED IN INDUSTRIAL ROOF TRUSS AND PORTAL FRAME", International Journal Of Creative and Innovative Research In All Studies,
vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9-13, 2018.
|
|
MLA
|
Nishchay Patel, Dr. Dhara Shah "COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SECTIONS USED IN INDUSTRIAL ROOF TRUSS AND PORTAL FRAME." International Journal Of Creative and Innovative Research In All Studies,
vol 1, no. 1, 2018, pp. 9-13.
|
|
APA
|
Nishchay Patel, Dr. Dhara Shah (2018). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SECTIONS USED IN INDUSTRIAL ROOF TRUSS AND PORTAL FRAME. International Journal Of Creative and Innovative Research In All Studies,
1(1), 9-13.
|
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SECTIONS USED IN INDUSTRIAL ROOF TRUSS AND PORTAL FRAME
Number Of Downloads - 18
Last downloaded on 21/08/2019
